- If such theses are proclaimed in the public sphere, then it is a rather serious matter. And either one should distance themselves from it, say that it was some, as President Kaczyński put it, semantic abuse. Or, if there is any truth to it, and I hear more politicians from Poland 2050 saying that the Marshal was indeed urged to commit, perhaps the most serious crime against the Republic of Poland, then it must be somehow explained. And I hope that the Marshal will explain it in this regard - stated Anna-Maria Żukowska on "Gość poranka" on TVP INFO, when asked if Hołownia should be interrogated by the prosecutor's office in connection with reports of him being incited to an attempted coup d'état.

- Well yes, but we also heard in the press about the Smolensk crash, right? Not an attempted coup, but a supposed terrorist attack. And if one says something and is a serious politician, the second person in the state, let us recall, then one must take responsibility for their words - she continued, when asked about Hołownia's explanations that he did not mean a coup in the legal sense, but in a journalistic one.

- I mean, if it truly happened, then it is serious. If he claims so, because he thinks so and publicizes it in this way, and it's only about some statements in the media sphere that he heard, then it's hard to call it persuasion, incitement, right? - she continued.