„Perhaps Submitting the Relevant Oath of Office to the Presidential Chancellery is Enough.” — Bodnar on Chmaj's Theory
NEWS
11/05/2018
11:07
Brejza:
We Dealt With Law Breaking, Introduction of a System of Monthly Bonuses
Brejza: We Dealt With Law Breaking, Introduction of a System of Monthly Bonuses
- Three months ago, I exposed a system of second salaries, regularly paid under the guise of awards, special bonuses for PiS politicians. A few days ago, I received information from the Chief Labour Inspector, which I find shocking. Earlier, we pointed out that even if PiS politicians wanted to give these second salaries a legal guise, claiming they were awards, there should have been justifications and decisions. An award is individual in nature, and PiS politicians should have been informed about it. It turns out there are no justifications and no documentation. Furthermore, Minister Szrot replied that these awards were not awards within the meaning of Article 105 of the Labour Code. This is very important. They were not awards in the sense of labour law. Article 105 obliges the authority to notify the employee, the minister, and to gather documentation in the files of each PiS politician employed in a ministerial position. I received a response from the Chief Labour Inspector. It turns out that he claims something completely different than Minister Szrot: annotations concerning the awarding of bonuses should in this case be found in personal files, located in individual ministries - stated Krzysztof Brejza at a briefing in the Sejm.
- A complete discrepancy. Minister Szrot - they were not awards under [Art.] 105, there are no annotations, no justifications. The Chief Labour Inspector - a body specialized in controlling such cases - states that this documentation, justifications, everything should have been gathered in employee files, which indicates that we were dealing with law breaking, the introduction of a system of monthly bonuses. What's more, they don't want to say how much they paid themselves in 2016 - added the PO MP. He emphasized that the second salaries were paid without legal basis, there is no justification or documentation, and the awarded individuals were not informed about it. In his opinion, the money should be returned to the budget.
- Three months ago, I exposed a system of second salaries, regularly paid under the guise of awards, special bonuses for PiS politicians. A few days ago, I received information from the Chief Labour Inspector, which I find shocking. Earlier, we pointed out that even if PiS politicians wanted to give these second salaries a legal guise, claiming they were awards, there should have been justifications and decisions. An award is individual in nature, and PiS politicians should have been informed about it. It turns out there are no justifications and no documentation. Furthermore, Minister Szrot replied that these awards were not awards within the meaning of Article 105 of the Labour Code. This is very important. They were not awards in the sense of labour law. Article 105 obliges the authority to notify the employee, the minister, and to gather documentation in the files of each PiS politician employed in a ministerial position. I received a response from the Chief Labour Inspector. It turns out that he claims something completely different than Minister Szrot: annotations concerning the awarding of bonuses should in this case be found in personal files, located in individual ministries - stated Krzysztof Brejza at a briefing in the Sejm.
- A complete discrepancy. Minister Szrot - they were not awards under [Art.] 105, there are no annotations, no justifications. The Chief Labour Inspector - a body specialized in controlling such cases - states that this documentation, justifications, everything should have been gathered in employee files, which indicates that we were dealing with law breaking, the introduction of a system of monthly bonuses. What's more, they don't want to say how much they paid themselves in 2016 - added the PO MP. He emphasized that the second salaries were paid without legal basis, there is no justification or documentation, and the awarded individuals were not informed about it. In his opinion, the money should be returned to the budget.
live
2 days
2 days
Morawiecki's Association: A Prelude to a New Party? Buda: Absolutely No Such Plans
2 days
„Let’s bypass the government in governing. Let’s go to a notary and sign a deed to lower fuel prices for Poles.” — Buda mocks the ‘Plan B’ for Constitutional Tribunal judges
2 days
Buda: The Government Has Lost its Democratic Legitimacy
2 days
Buda: The President Doesn't Support This Government Because He Knows It's Anti-Polish and Anti-State
2 days
Wiącek: The 'Next of Kin' Status Act Does Not Violate Article 18 of the Constitution
2 days
„These Orders Turned Out to Be Excessively Large in Virtually All Countries.” — Dworczyk on Vaccines
2 days
„I Don't Feel We Are Being Repressed.” — Dworczyk on the Situation of Morawiecki's Associates in the Party
2 days
What if the President Refuses to Swear In 4 Constitutional Tribunal Judges? Wiącek: This Constitutes Inaction by a Public Administration Body
2 days
Wiącek: The President Has No Discretion on Whether Someone Becomes a Constitutional Tribunal Judge
recommended
Wiącek: All 6 Constitutional Tribunal Judges Should Be Sworn In
recommended
Pełczyńska-Nałęcz: The President is Trying to Divide the Coalition. It Won't Work.
recommended
Sikorski: Poland Lacks Ambassadors in Almost Half the World's Countries. Does Not a Single Nomination Deserve a Signature?
recommended
"This is a breach of law." Leśkiewicz on the so-called Plan B for Constitutional Tribunal Judges
recommended
PiS Spokesperson: Kaczyński's Meeting with Morawiecki Concluded
recommended
"A Step in a Very Bad Direction." Mentzen Criticizes Nawrocki's Decision on PIP Reform
recommended
